Researchers of Traditional, Complementary, Alternative, & Integrative Medicine and Health

You are here

Canadian CAM Research Fund - For Canadian Members

The Canadian CAM Research Fund (CCRF) is an annual research funding competition that was launched in September 2009. The CCRF is organized and administered by INCAM and open to INCAM members.  Grants of up to $5000 are awarded to the research project proposals identified through a rigorous peer review process.

The 2017 CCRF competition is now open. Application deadline: November 1, 2017, 11:59pm (23:59) EST.

Please download and complete the application, then submit it to Chantal Morin: ***UPDATED EMAIL*** incam.info@iscmr.org

Please read the full details about the competition, below.

Past recipients: 

 

Support the CCRF!

Are you interested in sponsoring a CCRF grant?
You may specify criteria (pending approval) to be connected with your CCRF grant sponsorship. For example, a specific condition or a specific intervention.

Contact us!
Teresa Tsui at

CCRF Details

Background - About the CCRF:

The CCRF grant competition is an annual CAM funding competition. Invitations for submission of research proposals will be announced in the fall and deadline for applications will be in January/February. Grant recipients will be announced approximately 3 months after the proposal submission deadline.

Purpose and research priorities:

The primary goal of the CCRF is to increase and enhance CAM research capacity in Canada by supporting and funding relevant and high caliber studies that are in line with at least one of the following research priorities:

  1. Effectiveness and/or safety of CAM interventions (products, independent modalities and practices)*
  2. Evaluation of health care delivery models that incorporate CAM
  3. Development and evaluation/assessment of CAM specific policies in the context of health care delivery in Canada
  4. Effectiveness and/or usefulness of knowledge translation activities related to CAM information dissemination (to public, practitioners, etc.)

​* For the purposes of the CCRF funding competition. studies on modalities, practices, therapies, and systems of care categorized as complementary, alternative and integrative medicine will be considered. The proposed study must directly aim to assess, evaluate, examine, and/or test such an intervention.

Eligibility:

  1. Canadian INCAM members only (Canadian ISCMR members). To become an INCAM member, please visit: become a member
  2. Established Canadian researchers affiliated with academic institutions in Canada.
  3. New researchers and research trainees in the CAM field who are completing MSc and PhD level thesis projects at a Canadian university and are under the supervision of researcher at an academic institution which can administer the funds on their behalf.
  4. CAM practitioners who are working with an established researcher or a research trainee at an academic institution which can administer the funds on their behalf.
  5. Individuals who do not hold any outstanding CCRF grants (which they are in the progress of completing. This includes Principal applicants and Co-applicants). 
  6. In vitro and animal (non-human) studies are not eligible. 

**Priority will be given to projects that that are based on collaborative relationships: between CAM practitioners and researchers or across disciplines.

Review Process:

All applications will undergo a rigorous peer review process. All submitted proposals are first screened by the Internal Review Committee to ensure the basic criteria are met. These include: word count, overall grammar and use of appropriate language, overall quality of the study, and alignment with the stated research priorities. All submissions that pass the initial screening process are then reviewed independently by an external reviewer. Each proposal is reviewed by two external reviewers. External reviewers are selected based on a match with content and/or methodological expertise. External reviewers complete the CCRF Review and Ranking Form and submit it to the CCRF Administrator (Teresa Tsui). All reviews are then organized based on ranking. Submission rated as "fundable" are considered for funding. Decisions are based on a combined ranking score and specific feedback regarding strengths and weaknesses of the study. 

All applicants receive constructive feedback and guidance, based on the feedback from external reviewers, for improvement wherever possible.